Q1. So, in the end, how’d your WP2 paper go? What were you happy with? What weren’t you? Why? Be specific! (Remember: this is fodder for your end-of-quarter metacognitive reflection)
I am actually pretty pleased with my WP-2.
I thought I had good structure and flow, and that I was pretty clear in explaining the differences and similarities among the different articles. I also included more evidence from the readings than last time, and had a clearer thesis
Q2. Which 2 or 3 comments that you received yesterday were the most helpful for you? Why?
Unfortunately, I was unable to attend class for the peer review sesh... However, the big changes I made to my rough draft were:
1) restructuring my paper so that it is organized by ideas, with my sources interweaved
2) clarification of thesis/argument
3) inclusion of more evidence from readings
No comments:
Post a Comment