I spent more time than I would care to admit playing around with the SCIgen, Pandyland, and Meme generators. One could squander away the hours clicking that little ‘Generate’ button, while rarely encountering the same combination twice- the possibilities are virtually endless. This truly drives home the point that having all the established conventions associated with a certain genre is not necessary, because conventions are not rules. For example, you could keep clicking the ‘Generate’ button until your finger gets sore, and though each one that pops up will be different from the last, they will all fall under the umbrella of the same genre.
The first generator we will be looking at is SCI-gen, which is an Automatic Computer Science Paper Generator. It claims to use handwritten “context-free grammar”, which completely rings true once you read one of these generated papers and see that it is total nonsense. To begin, you type in up to five authors in the fields provided, and then click ‘Generate’. Up comes a very formal, dull-looking paper titled “Decoupling Fiber-Optic Cables from Public-Private Key Pairs in the Turing Machine” written by Carina Rodrigues, Zac Efron, and Mahatma Gandhi. In regards to its conventions, this paper looks and seems like the real deal. It is broken up into different sections separated by bold headings (a feature often seen in scholarly papers), such as the ‘Methodology’, ‘Implementation’, ‘Evaluation’, and so on. Multiple meaningless graphs and charts are also included, however they are very vague, hard to read, and make no relevant reference to the text. The language is convoluted (much like a real scientific paper is sometimes capable of being) and uses many big words. The generator also throws in a plethora of unexplained acronyms, to further mask the fact that it is chock-full of B.S. Lastly, the end of the paper incorporates an extensive list of made-up references. When someone who does not know any better takes a cursory glance at this paper, it appears to be a genuine, because it follows many (but not all) of the conventions of a scientific paper.
The next generator we will be examining is the Meme generator. Memes are usually humorous pictures accompanied by a sarcastic, ironic, or simply a comedic phrase. In regards to the text that accompanies the image, there is usually a line at the top introducing a situation or scenario, and a line at the bottom that acts as the comical, ironic part, or the “punchline” if you will. They will often include a pop culture reference to a celebrity or movie/TV scene, and a witty and relatable quote. This convention is a key reason as to why memes have pervaded the internet. The audience (usually younger people) is a generation that desperately wants to relate and connect with one another, and hear that others have the same feelings and go through the same things that they do. A good/successful meme has you saying in your head “Omg that is so true” or “Haha that has totally happened to me.”
The Pandyland comic generator was an interesting one, albeit crude, random, and often unfunny. The comic consisted of three squares, and featured two simply drawn males named Finlay and Simon, who are always dressed in the same clothes, and pictured against the same backdrop. After clicking ‘Generate’, a combination of random panels appears depicting a conversation via speech bubbles between these two characters, and it’s really a hit or miss as to whether it is funny, or even makes sense. This comic generator does follow a few of the conventions of an actual comic. It is short, so it can hold the audience’s attention and can be read through quickly, it includes speech bubbles to display communication between characters, and it (attempts to) offer the audience humor through a mini narrative.
Looking at these generators, it was interesting to see how each one could vary so much individually, but because they did share some of the same conventions, they could be considered to be part of the same genre. The SCIgen papers did not have to even make literate sense, but because of the format they were still considered part of the academic research paper genre, and despite how nonsense-ridden the Pandyland comics were, they still are comics, and are nevertheless also a part of that genre.



One of my favorite aspects of your writing is that it's very easy to read and flows very well. Your essay had a lighthearted yet analytical tone, which I thought fit well with your topics. Genres and conventions were supposed to be the main purpose of the PB and you accomplished that goal perfectly. You're a very good writer.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your PB! You presented the information in a clear, funny way which really grabbed my attention. I loved your explanation of the memes, especially when you gave the example of how one feels when they connect with a meme. Your visual explanation of the comic strips would definitely help a reader who did not have any idea what a comic strip was. The hipster generator that you found was very unique. It is bizarre that the Internet actually has websites like that to generate something so pointless. Overall, it seems like you have a pretty good understanding of the genre/convention topic and there isn't anything I can criticize!
ReplyDeleteCarina,
ReplyDelete“Here is a picture of me having a moment with a statue in Portugal this summer.” Ha! What a great start to your blog.
I appreciate your honest comments about 1st/2nd order thinking and your willingness to be open-minded. I don’t think that they need to be an either/or approach (and I don’t think that’s what you were suggesting). They’re basically a way to “free up” some folks and let them know that they can write TO LEARN, which can be a liberating feeling.
Re: PB1A, solid work. I like how you phrased this: “I feel that the goal of news satire is to point out and criticize the hypocrisy, irony, or general ridiculousness of the everyday happenings of the world.” Yep.
“
Re: PB1B, this also me laugh—“Decoupling Fiber-Optic Cables from Public-Private Key Pairs in the Turing Machine” written by Carina Rodrigues, Zac Efron, and Mahatma Gandhi.” I really like the tone of your blog; keep up the lighthearted fun. ☺
I’m glad you mentioned the punchlines on memes because that’s an essential convention of the genre. This was also a smart observation: “A good/successful meme has you saying in your head “Omg that is so true” or “Haha that has totally happened to me.”” Yep. I’ve written this on some other folks’ blogs, and I’d like to include it here too: with memes, the white capitalized font is outlined in black. Why would that be? Well, this way, the language can be displayed on any kind of background without getting drowned out. Also consider: what’s the content of pictures that are typically used? (Usually pop culture references, although some grainy “homemade” pictures are typically used too.) These are the sorts of angles and questions that I want us to develop an eye for.
Overall, excellent work so far, Carina. It’s thorough, it’s insightful, and it’s funny.
Z
I really liked this a lot Carina, it had a very nice flow and it was entertaining to read. You're writing keeps the reader interested. Your writing is very genuine and feels relatable, like you are talking to your reader. Also, I think your pictures were very nice touch, it made your ideas tie altogether, and also went together with your interactive writing. Nice work!
ReplyDeleteCarina, I really enjoy reading your writing style. You go into detail while still remaining concise and not allowing your ideas to drag on. You do an excellent job of introducing ideas, elaborating on them, and explaining their significance to the main idea. The way your work as a whole is structured makes it very easy to read and comprehend and it also leads the reader to make the conclusions you want them to. Great job Carina keep it up!
ReplyDelete